Then even extracting a JPEG from those (if you want to keep degradation to a minimum with no artifacts), the expense will be files that are still quite large. Those files are so huge you can’t really send them with ease, and you wouldn’t upload those to a site.
Jpegmini article professional#
And if you’re selling large professional prints, then, of course, you’ll approach your file much differently.Īnd let’s say you shoot RAW, catalogue in LR, process in Photoshop and, therefore, end up with huge TIFF files in LR. But when was the last time you emailed a RAW file? When was the last time you used RAW or even TIFF files when you created a client gallery online, or sent them proofs? When was the last time you sent a RAW file to be printed? Are there circumstances you may do any of the above, perhaps, but that would be the exception and not the rule. I’m not sure you should give yourself a pat on the back there, because so does pretty much everyone else. You can also check out this video of a 25-year veteran pressman at a printery analyzing two JPEGs to see if he could spot the difference with the JPEGmini version. To go even further, I decided to throw them both back into LR and see how much data could be used if you were, for some odd reason, to process these files. Here are 100% crops and even a 300% crop. That’s saving more than 2/3 of the space. Doing the same but using the JPEGmini plugin, it becomes a 3.2MB file. Exporting it at 100% JPEG through Lightroom generates an image that’s 9.8MB. The original image here is in Sony’s RAW ARW format and is coming in at 35MB. Since you can get the JPEGmini plugin for Lightroom, it seamlessly integrates with your workflow and allows you to set it even when you’re exporting a RAW file or TIFF into a JPEG. With JPEGmini they don’t ask any questions, so sometimes they’ll save 90% and other times it’ll be 70% or 60%, because the algorithm commits only to the quality. Other compression technologies in programs such as Lightroom and Photoshop will ask for a percentage or some quality parameter. We will stop short only just before there are any noticeable visual artifacts to humans, because that’s what the quality measure is aligned with. JPEGmini’s quality measure algorithm guides and drives the standard compression to the point that eliminates all the redundancies beyond human vision, but retains the original quality you can see. I would wager that for most of you, you’ll use Photoshop or Lightroom as your compression engines, and while they are good, JPEGmini is better. You can choose your compression levels, which makes the JPEG the image file type of choice for the internet, sharing, and storage. It’s an incredibly versatile image format that lets massive image files be saved at a fraction of the size with ‘minimal’ loss. Understand that we do love the JPEG on a whole. Simply, it is a program that allows you to compress your JPEG files to the utmost point before losing any perceivable quality. His name is Eli Lubitch, a previous VP at Kodak and R&D at Scitex, an image scientist, and now President of BEAMR which makes JPEGmini.
In boxing terms, this would be like Mike Tyson getting in the ring with Taylor Swift. I do know a good amount so I was probing him with some of my best, but within about 2 minutes I realized that, in terms of a technical knowledge challenge, I was outclassed. However, at PPE I also found myself in a conversation with a man who was probably one of the most intensely knowledgeable people I’ve met in the field of digital photography. Sure it’s just one little thing, but the occurrence is frequent this I find horrifying because there are lots of people out there pushing product that are really charlatans. Just recently in New York at PhotoPlus Expo, I met someone who runs photography workshops, charges good money for them, and didn’t even know you could fine tune your lens calibration.
That’s not really typical of what you’ll find in our field. I try to mitigate retaliation for my shortcomings in knowledge by trying to be humble about what I do know, and through heavy disclaimers even though I’m pretty well versed. Then, when you were 25, you realized quickly that wasn’t the case, and by 30, you’re not even sure which way is up. One just has to think about any teenager or even your past self, and, if you’re quietly honest, you’ll remember that when you were 16 you knew everything. We are literally drowning in information these days, and for most of us who are not of a Rain Man persuasion, it’s impossible to retain it all or even come to a definitive conclusion about something, because the more we’re told, the more we realize the less we actually know.